EDIT : everything I wrote before edit was wrong
Well lucky that I didn't get to read it :)
I just read again the utility of "far=2" : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels. Your result is normal as far as the first part of your drive is configured as raid 0. If you scan with ...
Search found 2 matches
- 18 May 2012, 01:40
- Forum: Filesystem repair
- Topic: linux raid-10 far=2 "filesystem damaged" false alarm?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5133
- 16 May 2012, 08:29
- Forum: Filesystem repair
- Topic: linux raid-10 far=2 "filesystem damaged" false alarm?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5133
linux raid-10 far=2 "filesystem damaged" false alarm?
I hit a (seemingly) disk related hiccup, and while everything seemed fine after a reboot,
I tried out all the checking tools I could. TestDisk gave a report that concerned me,
but I now suspect it might be a false positive due to my configuration.
I'll like to check that interpretation with the ...
I tried out all the checking tools I could. TestDisk gave a report that concerned me,
but I now suspect it might be a false positive due to my configuration.
I'll like to check that interpretation with the ...