Update: it took 180 hours to process an undelete operation on the whole disk (out of which 350GB were salvaged). Memory usage was quite low (~45MB at all time) as well as the CPU.
My impression is that the cluster processing and the header detection outweigh the bottleneck of the shared USB bus.
Search found 2 matches
- 19 Mar 2014, 10:29
- Forum: File recovery
- Topic: Would using a raspberry be significantly slow ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2465
- 08 Mar 2014, 23:09
- Forum: File recovery
- Topic: Would using a raspberry be significantly slow ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2465
Would using a raspberry be significantly slow ?
Hello,
I am in the middle of a salvage operation. Photorec put the estimate for data recovery north of +120 hours on my laptop so I decided to plug both disks into a spare Pi and let it run as long as it needs to.
I know the Pi's USB bus isn't the fastest around but I am concerned over whether the ...
I am in the middle of a salvage operation. Photorec put the estimate for data recovery north of +120 hours on my laptop so I decided to plug both disks into a spare Pi and let it run as long as it needs to.
I know the Pi's USB bus isn't the fastest around but I am concerned over whether the ...