However, when I tried to use softwares to test the microSD card like H2testw and FakeFlashTest, both gave me an error message and couldn't process the test. Windows even asked me if I wanted to check and fix the drive or not after that. Even so, Chkdsk utility told that the drive was okay.
So I used TestDisk to check against the drive and the program listed that there were some sort of Xenix bad block. Here come the logs:
Code: Select all
Partition table type (auto): None
Disk \\.\PhysicalDrive1 - 64 GB / 59 GiB
Partition table type: Intel
Analyse Disk \\.\PhysicalDrive1 - 64 GB / 59 GiB - CHS 7783 255 63
Geometry from i386 MBR: head=256 sector=63
check_part_i386 1 type FF: no test
check_part_i386 2 type FF: no test
check_part_i386 3 type FF: no test
check_part_i386 4 type FF: no test
Current partition structure:
1 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 534698 178 6 4294967295
Warning: Bad starting head (CHS and LBA don't match)
2 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 534698 178 6 4294967295
Warning: Bad starting head (CHS and LBA don't match)
3 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 534698 178 6 4294967295
Warning: Bad starting head (CHS and LBA don't match)
4 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 313426 126 42 740229375
Warning: Bad starting head (CHS and LBA don't match)
Only one partition must be bootable
Space conflict between the following two partitions
4 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 313426 126 42 740229375
1 * Xenix bad block 267349 89 4 534698 178 6 4294967295
search_part()
Disk \\.\PhysicalDrive1 - 64 GB / 59 GiB - CHS 7783 255 63
HPFS - NTFS 2 10 9 7783 139 36 125009920
exFAT, blocksize=131072, 64 GB / 59 GiB
Results
* HPFS - NTFS 2 10 9 7783 139 36 125009920
exFAT, blocksize=131072, 64 GB / 59 GiB