Paranoid with BrutoForce(on) Resumtion

Using PhotoRec to recover lost data
Forum rules
When asking for technical support:
- Search for posts on the same topic before posting a new question.
- Give clear, specific information in the title of your post.
- Include as many details as you can, MOST POSTS WILL GET ONLY ONE OR TWO ANSWERS.
- Post a follow up with a "Thank you" or "This worked!"
- When you learn something, use that knowledge to HELP ANOTHER USER LATER.
Before posting, please read https://www.cgsecurity.org/testdisk.pdf
Locked
Message
Author
mahos
Posts: 1
Joined: 17 Jun 2013, 11:16

Paranoid with BrutoForce(on) Resumtion

#1 Post by mahos »

The brute force thing really works great and recovers more files the only problem is that it doesn't support resumption from the point at witch it paused (for any reason) for example if the user pressed stop and then answered to "Do you really want to stop recovery ?" or if the partition to witch data is being recovered no longer has enough space and the recovery paused , such feature is of great importance and I urge the developer/s of the program to implement it as soon as possible.

it's especially of great importance for those who are recovering extremely large partition/disk and since photo rec recovers files in different sizes that can't be expected there is no way to guarantee that the disk to witch we are recovering has enough space for extremely large disk this would mean losing days of progress and starting all over a again.

Rio2
Posts: 3
Joined: 07 Oct 2014, 08:22

Re: Paranoid with BrutoForce(on) Resumtion

#2 Post by Rio2 »

I think I have ran into this same problem. My phase 1 has a few spots where it hangs (see my other thread: http://forum.cgsecurity.org/phpBB3/phot ... t4262.html), but luckily continues when I resume. However, now the scan has moved on to the brute force part, and I suspect that it is just brute forcing the results of the last resume (?).

Or is it, at least the last part of my resume had only 174 files, and now the process iterates numbers from 1 to 174... Should it do this? :?:

Locked