"Quick Search" Comparison for EFI GPT and Intel MBR

How to use TestDisk to recover lost partition
Forum rules
When asking for technical support:
- Search for posts on the same topic before posting a new question.
- Give clear, specific information in the title of your post.
- Include as many details as you can, MOST POSTS WILL GET ONLY ONE OR TWO ANSWERS.
- Post a follow up with a "Thank you" or "This worked!"
- When you learn something, use that knowledge to HELP ANOTHER USER LATER.
Before posting, please read https://www.cgsecurity.org/testdisk.pdf
Post Reply
Message
Author
azer25
Posts: 4
Joined: 21 Mar 2025, 12:48

"Quick Search" Comparison for EFI GPT and Intel MBR

#1 Post by azer25 »

Hi,

Is "Quick Search" faster when the partition is in Intel MBR than when it is in EFI GPT?

I have a 1TB external HDD. One of its partitions became RAW.

TestDisk automatically detected EFI GPT which I validated by leaving it as is. I launched Quick Search, the search took 4 days non-stop. Unfortunately, TestDisk told me that the partitions are unrecoverable!

I had used the same process for the same problem some time ago, and I was able to recover the data.

So I quit TestDisk and restarted it, this time choosing "Intel" and launched "Quick Search". The search this time was much faster, it took approximately less than 3 hours! The data counter was moving much faster.

The question here: Is "Quick Search" faster when the partition is in Intel MBR than when it is in EFI GPT? Have you observed the same thing?
Post Reply